The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Efficacy of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Alone or With Ascorbic Acid vs. 4 L Polyethylene Glycol for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2019.00182 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xu Tian, Bing Shi, Hui Chen, Xiao-Ling Liu, Rong-Ying Tang, Yuan-Ping Pi, Wei-Qing Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 15% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,026,894
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,763
of 5,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,392
of 342,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#44
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.