The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Relative Risk of Immune-Related Liver Dysfunction of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy in Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01063 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Siyao Deng, Qinyan Yang, Xiaochen Shu, Jinyi Lang, Shun Lu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Mexico | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Austria | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,020,203
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,946
of 16,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,842
of 344,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#130
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.