↓ Skip to main content

Protuberant Electrode Structures for Subretinal Electrical Stimulation: Modeling, Fabrication and in vivo Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protuberant Electrode Structures for Subretinal Electrical Stimulation: Modeling, Fabrication and in vivo Evaluation
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00885
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro González Losada, Lionel Rousseau, Marjorie Grzeskowiak, Manon Valet, Diep Nguyen, Julie Dégardin, Elisabeth Dubus, Serge Picaud, Gaelle Lissorgues

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Materials Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,053,522
of 26,526,993 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,383
of 12,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,665
of 352,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#262
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.