↓ Skip to main content

How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How In-Group Bias Influences Source Memory for Words Learned From In-Group and Out-Group Speakers
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Iacozza, Antje S. Meyer, Shiri Lev-Ari

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 38%
Linguistics 3 23%
Neuroscience 2 15%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,547,168
of 26,726,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,930
of 7,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,801
of 354,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#26
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,726,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.