↓ Skip to main content

ÉTICA, ESCRITA E LEITURA DA HISTÓRIA: OS PROBLEMAS DA EXPECTATIVA E DA CONFIANÇA

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de História (São Paulo), September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ÉTICA, ESCRITA E LEITURA DA HISTÓRIA: OS PROBLEMAS DA EXPECTATIVA E DA CONFIANÇA
Published in
Revista de História (São Paulo), September 2019
DOI 10.11606/issn.2316-9141.rh.2019.142982
Authors

João Rodolfo Munhoz Ohara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,040,857
of 26,559,802 outputs
Outputs from Revista de História (São Paulo)
#177
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,466
of 353,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de História (São Paulo)
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.