The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ERRα is an aggressive factor in lung adenocarcinoma indicating poor prognostic outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s204732 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ping Li, Jian Wang, Desheng Wu, Xiaohu Ren, Wen Wu, Ran Zuo, Qingbo Zeng, Bingyu Wang, Xi He, Jianhui Yuan, Ni Xie |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,028,437
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#950
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,273
of 340,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#33
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.