Title |
Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-016-0237-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brittany U. Burda, Haley K. Holmer, Susan L. Norris |
Abstract |
A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is a commonly used tool to assess the quality of systematic reviews; however, modifications are needed to improve its usability, reliability, and validity. In this commentary, we summarize our experience and the experiences of others who have used AMSTAR and provide suggestions for its improvement. We propose that AMSTAR should modify a number of individual items and their instructions and responses to make them more congruent with an assessment of the methodologic quality of systematic reviews. We recommend adding new items and modifying existing items to assess the quality of the body of evidence and to address subgroup and sensitivity analyses. More detailed instructions are needed for scoring individual items across multiple reviewers, and we recommend that a total score should not be calculated. These suggestions need to be empirically tested prior to implementation. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
Scientists | 7 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
Researcher | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 28 | 28% |
Unknown | 15 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 27% |