↓ Skip to main content

Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Microbiology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
232 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
869 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes
Published in
Nature Reviews Microbiology, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41579-019-0255-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher E. Lawson, William R. Harcombe, Roland Hatzenpichler, Stephen R. Lindemann, Frank E. Löffler, Michelle A. O’Malley, Héctor García Martín, Brian F. Pfleger, Lutgarde Raskin, Ophelia S. Venturelli, David G. Weissbrodt, Daniel R. Noguera, Katherine D. McMahon

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 869 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 869 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 191 22%
Researcher 142 16%
Student > Master 95 11%
Student > Bachelor 68 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 104 12%
Unknown 226 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 176 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 152 17%
Engineering 63 7%
Environmental Science 55 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 40 5%
Other 105 12%
Unknown 278 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 147. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#303,001
of 26,735,240 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#156
of 2,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,026
of 359,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Microbiology
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,735,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.