The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Field-Scale Co-fermentation of Solid Waste From Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets (UDDT-SW) and Banana Waste to Produce Undissociated Carboxylic Acids to Inactivate Ascaris Eggs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00139 |
Authors |
Lauren A. Harroff, Janice L. Liotta, Emily E. Wangolo, Tim J. S. Egan, Dwight D. Bowman, Largus T. Angenent |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 22% |
Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,330,390
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,065
of 3,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,352
of 346,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.