The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Unfolding additional massive cutback effects of the Native Vegetation Protection Law on Legal Reserves, Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0658 |
Authors |
Paulo André Tavares, Alice Dantas Brites, Gerd Sparovek, Vinícius Guidotti, Felipe Cerignoni, Daniel Aguiar, Jean Paul Metzger, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Luis Fernando Guedes Pinto, Kaline de Mello, Paulo Guilherme Molin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 25 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 26% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,342,292
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#102
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,875
of 451,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.