You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Curcumin: Novel Treatment in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01351 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eridan Rocha-Ferreira, Claudia Sisa, Sarah Bright, Tessa Fautz, Michael Harris, Ingrid Contreras Riquelme, Chinedu Agwu, Tugce Kurulday, Beenaben Mistry, Daniel Hill, Sigrun Lange, Mariya Hristova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 69% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,884
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,501
of 14,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,388
of 361,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#34
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.