↓ Skip to main content

p38 MAPK Signaling in Osteoblast Differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
p38 MAPK Signaling in Osteoblast Differentiation
Published in
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcell.2016.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eddie Rodríguez-Carballo, Beatriz Gámez, Francesc Ventura

Abstract

The skeleton is a highly dynamic tissue whose structure relies on the balance between bone deposition and resorption. This equilibrium, which depends on osteoblast and osteoclast functions, is controlled by multiple factors that can be modulated post-translationally. Some of the modulators are Mitogen-activated kinases (MAPKs), whose role has been studied in vivo and in vitro. p38-MAPK modifies the transactivation ability of some key transcription factors in chondrocytes, osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which affects their differentiation and function. Several commercially available inhibitors have helped to determine p38 action on these processes. Although it is frequently mentioned in the literature, this chemical approach is not always as accurate as it should be. Conditional knockouts are a useful genetic tool that could unravel the role of p38 in shaping the skeleton. In this review, we will summarize the state of the art on p38 activity during osteoblast differentiation and function, and emphasize the triggers of this MAPK.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 223 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 14%
Engineering 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#12,892,884
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#1,983
of 9,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,304
of 298,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.