↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing Immune Response and Heterosubtypic Protection Ability of Inactivated H7N9 Vaccine by Using STING Agonist as a Mucosal Adjuvant

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing Immune Response and Heterosubtypic Protection Ability of Inactivated H7N9 Vaccine by Using STING Agonist as a Mucosal Adjuvant
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Luo, Xu-ping Liu, Fei-fei Xiong, Fei-xia Gao, Ying-lei Yi, Min Zhang, Ze Chen, Wen-song Tan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,442,371
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#16,140
of 33,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,595
of 362,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#451
of 662 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 662 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.