The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Assessment of Computer-Generated Stimuli for Use in Studies of Body Size Estimation and Bias
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02390 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanna Alexi, Kendra Dommisse, Dominique Cleary, Romina Palermo, Nadine Kloth, Jason Bell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 5 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 18 | 41% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,285,534
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,283
of 34,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,328
of 373,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#147
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.