The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Palliative care interventions for people with multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012936.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina OC Latorraca, Ana Luiza C Martimbianco, Daniela V Pachito, Maria Regina Torloni, Rafael L Pacheco, Juliana Gomes Pereira, Rachel Riera |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 341 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 159 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 9% |
| Psychology | 31 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 165 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,750,769
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,156
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,284
of 376,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.