↓ Skip to main content

Massage therapy for people with HIV/AIDS

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Massage therapy for people with HIV/AIDS
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007502.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L Hillier, Quinette Louw, Linzette Morris, Jeanine Uwimana, Sue Statham

Abstract

Infection with human immunodeficency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficency syndrome (AIDS) is a pandemic that has affected millions of people globally. Although major research and clinical initiatives are addressing prevention and cure strategies, issues of quality of life for survivors have received less attention. Massage therapy is proposed to have a positive effect on quality of life and may also have a positive effect on immune function through stress mediation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 365 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Researcher 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 123 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 23%
Psychology 43 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 11%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 132 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,749,491
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,559
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,567
of 177,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.