↓ Skip to main content

Selective Localization of Shanks to VGLUT1-Positive Excitatory Synapses in the Mouse Hippocampus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selective Localization of Shanks to VGLUT1-Positive Excitatory Synapses in the Mouse Hippocampus
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2016.00106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Heise, Jan C. Schroeder, Michael Schoen, Sonja Halbedl, Dominik Reim, Sarah Woelfle, Michael R. Kreutz, Michael J. Schmeisser, Tobias M. Boeckers

Abstract

Members of the Shank family of multidomain proteins (Shank1, Shank2, and Shank3) are core components of the postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory synapses. At synaptic sites Shanks serve as scaffolding molecules that cluster neurotransmitter receptors as well as cell adhesion molecules attaching them to the actin cytoskeleton. In this study we investigated the synapse specific localization of Shank1-3 and focused on well-defined synaptic contacts within the hippocampal formation. We found that all three family members are present only at VGLUT1-positive synapses, which is particularly visible at mossy fiber contacts. No costaining was found at VGLUT2-positive contacts indicating that the molecular organization of VGLUT2-associated PSDs diverges from classical VGLUT1-positive excitatory contacts in the hippocampus. In light of SHANK mutations in neuropsychiatric disorders, this study indicates which glutamatergic networks within the hippocampus will be primarily affected by shankopathies.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 19 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2016.
All research outputs
#18,453,763
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,260
of 4,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,835
of 298,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#67
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.