↓ Skip to main content

The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
578 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, October 2019
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkz943
Pubmed ID
Authors

James J Davis, Alice R Wattam, Ramy K Aziz, Thomas Brettin, Ralph Butler, Rory M Butler, Philippe Chlenski, Neal Conrad, Allan Dickerman, Emily M Dietrich, Joseph L Gabbard, Svetlana Gerdes, Andrew Guard, Ronald W Kenyon, Dustin Machi, Chunhong Mao, Dan Murphy-Olson, Marcus Nguyen, Eric K Nordberg, Gary J Olsen, Robert D Olson, Jamie C Overbeek, Ross Overbeek, Bruce Parrello, Gordon D Pusch, Maulik Shukla, Chris Thomas, Margo VanOeffelen, Veronika Vonstein, Andrew S Warren, Fangfang Xia, Dawen Xie, Hyunseung Yoo, Rick Stevens

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 578 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 15%
Researcher 65 11%
Student > Master 64 11%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 4%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 205 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 121 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 67 12%
Environmental Science 15 3%
Computer Science 12 2%
Other 59 10%
Unknown 228 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,268,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#2,328
of 27,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,414
of 379,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#66
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.