The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tissues Harvested Using an Automated Surgical Approach Confirm Molecular Heterogeneity of Glioblastoma and Enhance Specimen's Translational Research Value
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.01119 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edie Zusman, Maxim Sidorov, Alexandria Ayala, Jimmin Chang, Eric Singer, Michelle Chen, Pierre-Yves Desprez, Sean McAllister, Nathan Salomonis, Kashish Chetal, Gautam Prasad, Tyler Kang, Joseph Mark, Lawrence Dickinson, Liliana Soroceanu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 3 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,294,544
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,505
of 22,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,950
of 376,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#240
of 491 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 491 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.