You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Optimization – From Physics-Based Computer Simulations to High-Fidelity Head Phantom Fabrication and Measurements
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00388 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leon Morales-Quezada, Mirret M. El-Hagrassy, Beatriz Costa, R. Andy McKinley, Pengcheng Lv, Felipe Fregni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 8 | 19% |
Engineering | 6 | 14% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,086,313
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,067
of 7,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,147
of 381,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#57
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.