The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Virtual Versus an Augmented Reality Cooking Task Based-Tools: A Behavioral and Physiological Study on the Assessment of Executive Functions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02529 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli, Cristina Bermejo Vidal, Mariano Alcañiz Raya |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 14 | 16% |
Computer Science | 10 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 40 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,585,798
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,228
of 30,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,233
of 360,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#311
of 573 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 573 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.