↓ Skip to main content

Review of the Clinical Evidences of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia (mEHT) Method: An Update for the Practicing Oncologist

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of the Clinical Evidences of Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia (mEHT) Method: An Update for the Practicing Oncologist
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.01012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Attila M. Szasz, Carrie Anne Minnaar, Gyongyver Szentmártoni, Gyula P. Szigeti, Magdolna Dank

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,336,651
of 26,526,880 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,063
of 23,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,575
of 382,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#85
of 500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.