You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of passive ultrasonic activation on microorganisms in primary root canal infection: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esteban Isai Flores Orozco, Cassia Cestari Toia, Daiana Cavalli, Rayana Duarte Khoury, Flávia Goulart da Rosa Cardoso, Eduardo Bresciani, Marcia Carneiro Valera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 40 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#496
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402,956
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#63
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.