↓ Skip to main content

Management of drainage for malignant ascites in gynaecological cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of drainage for malignant ascites in gynaecological cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007794.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Siwanon Rattanakanokchai, Nampet Jampathong, Jatupol Srisomboon, Pisake Lumbiganon

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Master 16 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 10 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 92 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 93 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,641,763
of 26,574,355 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,697
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,677
of 485,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,574,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.