Title |
Does simile comprehension differ from metaphor comprehension? A functional MRI study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brain & Language, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Midori Shibata, Akira Toyomura, Hiroki Motoyama, Hiroaki Itoh, Yasuhiro Kawabata, Jun-ichi Abe |
Abstract |
Since Aristotle, people have believed that metaphors and similes express the same type of figurative meaning, despite the fact that they are expressed with different sentence patterns. In contrast, recent psycholinguistic models have suggested that metaphors and similes may promote different comprehension processes. In this study, we investigated the neural substrates involved in the comprehension of metaphor and simile using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to evaluate whether simile comprehension differs from metaphor comprehension or not. In the metaphor and simile sentence conditions, higher activation was seen in the left inferior frontal gyrus. This result suggests that the activation in both metaphor and simile conditions indicates similar patterns in the left frontal region. The results also suggest that similes elicit higher levels of activation in the medial frontal region which might be related to inference processes, whereas metaphors elicit more right-sided prefrontal activation which might be related to figurative language comprehension. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 50% |
Belgium | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 27% |
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Other | 19 | 19% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Linguistics | 28 | 28% |
Psychology | 26 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 14 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |