↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Control of Antibacterial Immunity: Findings from Animal Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circadian Control of Antibacterial Immunity: Findings from Animal Models
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Landry L. Tsoumtsa, Cedric Torre, Eric Ghigo

Abstract

Most of the biological functions, including the immune system, are linked to circadian rhythms in living organisms. Changes occurring to biological parameters as the result of these circadian rhythms can therefore affect the outcome of a disease. For decades, model organisms have proven to be a great tool to understanding biological mechanisms such as circadian cycle and immunity. In this review, we created an inventory of the use of model organisms in order to decipher the relation between circadian rhythms and antibacterial immunity.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,661,887
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,181
of 6,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,821
of 306,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.