The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: motor imagery and observational balance training
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00972 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wolfgang Taube, Michael Lorch, Sibylle Zeiter, Martin Keller |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
Researcher | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 39 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 31 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 11% |
Psychology | 11 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Unknown | 48 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,593,944
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,321
of 7,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,817
of 362,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#152
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.