The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Resolution Transcranial Electrical Simulation for Living Mice Based on Magneto-Acoustic Effect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoqing Zhou, Shikun Liu, Yuexiang Wang, Tao Yin, Zhuo Yang, Zhipeng Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 35% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 21% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,370,550
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,063
of 11,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,190
of 486,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#156
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.