↓ Skip to main content

ビスフォスフォネート製剤の不適切な服用方法による発症が疑われた口腔粘膜潰瘍

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ビスフォスフォネート製剤の不適切な服用方法による発症が疑われた口腔粘膜潰瘍
Published in
Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, November 2019
DOI 10.5794/jjoms.65.599
Authors

新田 哲也, 坂元 亮一, 平原 成浩, 松村 吉晃, 中村 康大, 後藤 雄一

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#21,305,573
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#86
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,432
of 481,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them