↓ Skip to main content

Early versus delayed postoperative radiotherapy for treatment of low‐grade gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus delayed postoperative radiotherapy for treatment of low‐grade gliomas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009229.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjay Dhawan, Chirag G Patil, Clark Chen, Andrew S Venteicher

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 11%
Other 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 92 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 94 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,032,658
of 26,794,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,408
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,540
of 487,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.