The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Computational Prediction and Validation of Tumor-Associated Neoantigens
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00027 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vladimir Roudko, Benjamin Greenbaum, Nina Bhardwaj |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 62 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 55 | 27% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 5% |
Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Unknown | 68 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,946,770
of 26,382,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#11,448
of 33,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,905
of 481,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#286
of 588 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,382,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 588 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.