The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review of ex vivo Elemental Mapping Methods to Directly Image Changes in the Homeostasis of Diffusible Ions (Na+, K+, Mg2 +, Ca2 +, Cl–) Within Brain Tissue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Hartnell, Wendy Andrews, Nicole Smith, Haibo Jiang, Erin McAllum, Ramesh Rajan, Frederick Colbourne, Melinda Fitzgerald, Virginie Lam, Ryusuke Takechi, M. Jake Pushie, Michael E. Kelly, Mark J. Hackett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,442,165
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,505
of 11,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,097
of 483,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#69
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.