The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chronic Pain Patients’ Kinesiophobia and Catastrophizing are Associated with Activity Intensity at Different Times of the Day
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s230039 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew B Miller, Melissa J Roumanis, Lisa Kakinami, Geoffrey C Dover |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 18% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 33 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 37 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,728,284
of 23,567,959 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#200
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,138
of 459,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.