The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-term Effect of Intraocular Lens vs Contact Lens Correction on Visual Acuity After Cataract Surgery During Infancy
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Scott R. Lambert, George Cotsonis, Lindreth DuBois, Azhar Nizam, Stacey J. Kruger, E. Eugenie Hartmann, David R. Weakley, Carolyn Drews-Botsch |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 54 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 53 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,736,551
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#881
of 6,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,638
of 401,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#16
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.