↓ Skip to main content

Using GRADE methodology for the development of public health guidelines for the prevention and treatment of HIV and other STIs among men who have sex with men and transgender people

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using GRADE methodology for the development of public health guidelines for the prevention and treatment of HIV and other STIs among men who have sex with men and transgender people
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elie A Akl, Caitlin Kennedy, Kelika Konda, Carlos F Caceres, Tara Horvath, George Ayala, Andrew Doupe, Antonio Gerbase, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Eddy R Segura, Holger J Schünemann, Ying-Ru Lo

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) Department of HIV/AIDS led the development of public health guidelines for delivering an evidence-based, essential package of interventions for the prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people in the health sector in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this paper is to review the methodological challenges faced and solutions applied during the development of the guidelines.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Georgia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 27%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 39%
Social Sciences 25 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,365,136
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,224
of 18,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,649
of 180,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#96
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.