The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Buccal bifurcation cyst as an incidental finding in cone beam computed tomography scans
|
---|---|
Published in |
RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/1981-863720180004000013jl |
Authors |
Anne Caroline OENNING, Luciana Butini OLIVEIRA, José Luiz Cintra JUNQUEIRA, Saulo L. SOUSA MELO |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Librarian | 1 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 60% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#23,737,386
of 26,460,266 outputs
Outputs from RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
#46
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#392,387
of 450,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,460,266 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.