The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cautionary note on the power of the test for the indirect effect in mediation analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01549 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tom Loeys, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Stijn Vansteelandt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
France | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 75% |
Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Belgium | 2 | 1% |
Macao | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 24% |
Researcher | 24 | 15% |
Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 67 | 41% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,249,176
of 26,547,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,165
of 35,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,497
of 363,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#185
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,547,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.