The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Trends of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation From 2009 to 2018: A Bibliometric Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00106 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kang-Yong Zheng, Guang-Yan Dai, Yue Lan, Xue-Qiang Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
Switzerland | 2 | 18% |
France | 1 | 9% |
China | 1 | 9% |
Japan | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 14 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,633,156
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,321
of 11,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,586
of 387,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#150
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.