The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimal spatial prioritization of control resources for elimination of invasive species under demographic uncertainty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecological Applications, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/eap.2126 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kim M. Pepin, Timothy J. Smyser, Amy J. Davis, Ryan S. Miller, Sophie McKee, Kurt C. VerCauteren, William Kendall, Chris Slootmaker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,968,143
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,588
of 3,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,582
of 375,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#39
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.