↓ Skip to main content

Two-Person Approaches to Studying Social Interaction in Psychiatry: Uses and Clinical Relevance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-Person Approaches to Studying Social Interaction in Psychiatry: Uses and Clinical Relevance
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yafeng Pan, Xiaojun Cheng

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 33 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 27%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 39 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,379,467
of 26,480,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#3,565
of 13,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,818
of 409,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#127
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,480,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.