The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The mole of Peninsular Malaysia: notes on its identification and ecology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mammal Study, January 2003
|
DOI | 10.3106/mammalstudy.28.73 |
Authors |
Shin-ichiro Kawada, Akio Shinohara, Masatoshi Yasuda, Sen-ichi Oda, Lim Boo Liat |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
Thailand | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 30% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,609,253
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Study
#45
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,861
of 130,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Study
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them