The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Sample Preparation Techniques for Inspection of Leaf Epidermises Using Light Microscopy and Scanning Electronic Microscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.00133 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinhong Yuan, Xiaoduan Wang, Huihui Zhou, Yulin Li, Jing Zhang, Shuxin Yu, Mengni Wang, Menghan Hao, Qian Zhao, Le Liu, Mingjun Li, Junhua Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 44 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,674,959
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,804
of 20,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,717
of 360,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#225
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.