↓ Skip to main content

Synaptic clustering during development and learning: the why, when, and how

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synaptic clustering during development and learning: the why, when, and how
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan Winnubst, Christian Lohmann

Abstract

To contribute to a functional network a neuron must make specific connections and integrate the synaptic inputs that it receives in a meaningful way. Previous modeling and experimental studies have predicted that this specificity could entail a subcellular organization whereby synapses that carry similar information are clustered together on local stretches of dendrite. Recent imaging studies have now, for the first time, demonstrated synaptic clustering during development and learning in different neuronal circuits. Interestingly, this organization is dependent on synaptic activity and most likely involves local plasticity mechanisms. Here we discuss these new insights and give an overview of the candidate plasticity mechanisms that could be involved.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Japan 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Greece 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 135 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 34%
Researcher 35 24%
Student > Master 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 42%
Neuroscience 44 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 12 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,363,429
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,303
of 2,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,638
of 244,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.