The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characterization of Forearm Muscle Activation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy via High-Density Electromyography: A Case Study on the Implications for Myoelectric Control
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neurology, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00231 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kostas Nizamis, Noortje H. M. Rijken, Robbert van Middelaar, João Neto, Bart F. J. M. Koopman, Massimo Sartori |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 22% |
Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
India | 1 | 11% |
France | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 28 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 16 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,899,953
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#867
of 12,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,232
of 375,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#48
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.