The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using Ultrasonic Acoustics to Detect Cryptic Flying Squirrels: Effects of Season and Habitat Quality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/wsb.1083 |
Authors |
Corinne A. Diggins, L. Michelle Gilley, Christine A. Kelly, W. Mark Ford |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 7 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 39% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,601,876
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#252
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,147
of 397,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.