The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Therapeutic effects of isoflavones on impaired salivary secretion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.3164/jcbn.14-49 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Koufuchi Ryo, Ayako Takahashi, Yoh Tamaki, Mayumi Ohnishi-Kameyama, Hiroko Inoue, Ichiro Saito |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 21% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,484,222
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#148
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,756
of 264,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.