The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Ethics guidelines on COVID-19 triage—an emerging international consensus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02927-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne Joebges, Nikola Biller-Andorno |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 22% |
| Unknown | 57 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,733,710
of 26,619,752 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,313
of 6,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,260
of 419,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#89
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,619,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.