The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toward Standardization of Electrophysiology and Computational Tissue Strain in Rodent Intracortical Microelectrode Models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00416 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shreya Mahajan, John K. Hermann, Hillary W. Bedell, Jonah A. Sharkins, Lei Chen, Keying Chen, Seth M. Meade, Cara S. Smith, Jacob Rayyan, He Feng, Youjoung Kim, Matthew A. Schiefer, Dawn M. Taylor, Jeffrey R. Capadona, Evon S. Ereifej |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 11 | 32% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,990,390
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#1,792
of 6,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,777
of 382,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#170
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.