The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early versus late parenteral nutrition for critically ill term and late preterm infants
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013141.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kwi Moon, Gayatri K Athalye-Jape, Uday Rao, Shripada C Rao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
France | 1 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
Researcher | 18 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 12% |
Unknown | 116 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 1% |
Other | 19 | 8% |
Unknown | 126 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,236,887
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,440
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,323
of 401,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.