↓ Skip to main content

Correcting Task fMRI Signals for Variability in Baseline CBF Improves BOLD-Behavior Relationships: A Feasibility Study in an Aging Model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correcting Task fMRI Signals for Variability in Baseline CBF Improves BOLD-Behavior Relationships: A Feasibility Study in an Aging Model
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2020.00336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy, Lisa C. Krishnamurthy, Jonathan H. Drucker, Suprateek Kundu, Bing Ji, Kyle Hortman, Simone R. Roberts, Kevin Mammino, Stella M. Tran, Kaundinya Gopinath, Keith M. McGregor, Amy D. Rodriguez, Deqiang Qiu, Bruce Crosson, Joe R. Nocera

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 25%
Psychology 6 19%
Linguistics 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,723
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,724
of 408,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#342
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.